JAN'S
FRESH
REAL
NEWS
*****************************************************************************************************
© 2001:
JAN
COX
****************************************************
November
14, 2001.
THE MATHEMATICS OF STUPIDTY
____________________
There
are three types of stupidity:
stupidity
about certain things (biology, plumbing);
general
stupidity (being genetically a 40 watt bulb when the standard is 100)
and
stupidity about yourself;
the
first can be cured by instruction; the second only by death,
and
trying to cure the third is such an act of stupidity that even talking
about it
threatens
to insult a normal man’s intelligence... (but we’ll see).
People
as a rule make no distinction between the first two,
so
that a mechanic calls a man stupid who does not know what a spark plug
does
while
the man may be actually above average in general intelligence,
even
an expert in some other area,
but
when on-the-verbal-&-mental-run,
humans
tend to lump all forms of instantly confronted stupidity together.
You
cure the first type of specific stupidity by addition:
by
adding information regarding the material matter in which you are interested,
but
about which you lack knowledge, to your brain’s storage centre;
(and
as noted: nothing will cure the overall inherent type of stupidity,
other
than waiting it out);
trying
to cure the third type of stupidity would seem to involve the same approach
as with the first: by adding information about yourself to your brain’s
present
collection of data thereabout....(but this is a spook adventure).
People who follow the first course
are considered educated;
those of the second sort are
pitied and tolerated,
and those who engage in (at
least mouth wise)
the third activity are deemed
to possess superior insight and intention;
all who do not want to appear
publicly stupid will affirm in public (if asked)
that knowing about yourself
is a far greater thing than knowing about
plumbing, or mechanics or anything
else merely material,
but none who pay lip tribute
thereto have any notion at all what they are talking about,
and least of all those who seriously
believe that they are fruitfully engaged therein…
…(but perhaps that is already
so well known to you that
the matter even being
broached approaches an intellectual affront… …
….but we’ll see).
Normal,
sane people (if prompted) will assert that if they had a
fuller
knowledge about themselves, their lives would be improved;
would
work better; they would engage in less (or perhaps, no) unprofitable behavior,
because:
with
sufficient knowledge about oneself, one would know why one does the things
one
does (including the stupid ones),
and
with such knowledge, be able to then alter said costly behavior.
This
is so obviously so that only someone exceptionally stupid would
take
exception thereto.
A man had a basket of berries, but wanted more,
so the obvious thing to do was put more in his basket.
All the berries in the world existed only in his basket. The End.
..........(Oh, did I mention that he never realized it. The End.
A
parrot lived on a rhino’s back;
he
one day announced that their lives would improve
if
they had fuller knowledge of themselves;
the
rhino showed no resistance to the idea -- so:
the
bird began reporting aloud on what he observed the rhino doing,
and
then commenting on his reports:
a
two pronged activity that seemed to cover all bases.
The
parrot was stupid; the rhino was a rhino;
neither
was harmed by the parrot’s frivolity,
(although
it did cause the bird to get a reputation for “edginess” --
...at
least within certain circles in his own head).
You
can examine a carton until cows start to enter marathons,
but
you will never understand a single, meaningful thing about the box
unless
you know where it came from and what it is doing in your possession.
Certainly
a well drawn cut off line among normal people dividing the sane from the
insane would be the question: Can a person
know who they are?
Anyone
who would defer is clearly out of their mind,
and
from the stable table which supports mankind’s total second reality of
all things cultural, spiritual, intellectual & otherwise intangible
-- such a view is correct.
A
man who would say that he has no knowledge at all of who he is,
and
does not believe that such knowledge is possible,
would
be rightly seen as insane and completely out of touch with
the
plain reality of things in which all normal people live.
And
it is a delightful humdinger of a demarcation
for
if you find the statement: “You
do not have any knowledge of who you are”
ridiculous and patently not true
then
you are guaranteed: sane, normal, non stupid (in the second category),
and
most likely, ordinary in every respect …(oh, and did I mention:
as
ignorant to what is going on all around you as a comatose man in a coffin).
It
need be noted howsomever that the statement:
“Men
have no knowledge at all of who they are”
is
perhaps the stupidest thing a human can say,
for
it is without any substance (forget, veracity) -- without any substance
whatever,
(and
it has no bizness being said...............least in polite company).
Any
thing you say about spark plugs has substance, whether it be a correct
or
incorrect reflection of what they physically are and do;
whatever
you may say about them will have substance because they have substance;
whether the statement is deemed true or false
is
irrelevant to the comment having its own substance,
but
anything a man says about himself -- not about the rhino (which
has substance) --
but
anything the parrot-man-mind
says about Itself -- has no substance.
...(‘Course
in the routine world, clinically “sane” people debate whether
the
gold that paves the streets of Heaven is 24 carat or not).
The
bur under the saddle blanket of the few is what today’s news coverage
has
been about (Surprise!),
but
when put into plain words like: “You
do not and cannot know who you are”
it
can sound as insane to the few as it does to the many;
but
rest assured that it is not insane at all -- indeed once you see
the reality of it
for
yourself, you realize that thinking otherwise is the zenith of absurdity.
To
where -- and how -- can the universe step away from itself
to
get a good look at itself -- and thus know who/what
it is?! --
and
if the universe itself cannot know who it is, what might that suggest about
man,
(vis
a vis what has above been, blah, blah, blah, blah, blahed).
The
few have oft been told that what is bothering them is their stupidity of
themselves, and that to achieve the desired state of being enlightened
from their state of darkness & ignorance, the method is one of: self
study and ultimately -- self
knowledge;
that
when a man knows-who-he-is -- he is fully conscious, awake
and free –
--
which is correct -- but with a minor, overlooked pickle.
The
enlightening understanding is not contained in your finally, knowing
who you are, but in realizing that you do not and cannot know.
You
then discover yourself living completely surrounded by creatures who
profess
just the opposite,
but
now that you know the truth,
you
realize the scientific basis for the feeling you always had of
juxtaposition
to your fellow rhinos -- and to your own
inner-parrot-self --
but
from which now -- you are free.
That
is the paramount pay off:
the
entire human population is irreversibly stupid about a certain matter:
thinking they know who they are,
and now you are no longer so deluded:
you’re stupid and you KNOW it.
"That
was supposed to
be the supreme forbidden fruit! How’d you do it
any way?"
"Duhhh,
I dunno...........I jus' kept tryin'."
Yes,
you
too
can
be
totally
ignorant and
free;
all
it
takes
is
determination
--
and
the
ability
to
subtract
--
not
add.
J