JAN'S
FRESH FICTIONAL NEWS
.....('cept for the fact that it's all true)
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
© 2001:
JAN
COX
***********************************
December
19, 2001.
Man
has been called: blind, asleep & in-the-dark;
many
enjoy making such accusations, and many more enjoy hearing them,
but
what is the underlying reality that incites this verbal invective?
It
comes about because of a certain condition natural to man
which
can be easily described and momentarily recognized by all,
but
whose significance few human brains are wired capable of realizing,
via
the ability to hold a constant awareness thereof,
and
it is the fact that men have two sets of eyes/I’s:
two
sources of sight:
two
methods by which they look at life and themselves:
they
have their physical eyes, visible on their face
which
take in the world outside of them,
and
they have their invisible, mental eyes inside their head
which
take in the world inside their brain.
The
importance of man’s outer vision is obvious,
sight
being his primary survival sense,
and
normally is his inner vision accorded equal status,
but
it receives same by avoiding close scrutiny of its overall operations.
Man’s
visible eyes look at the world;
his
inner ones look at thought:
simple
enough, and evident.
But
there is something going on in the latter activity that although
clearly
observable, has never been part of humanity’s established comprehension,
an
absence which alone has been the eternal source of the various condemnatory
descriptions of him being: blind, asleep & in-the-dark.
The
feature is the inner eyes’ incessant self-absorption.
Man’s
visible eyes have an important task:
his
constant orientation in the physical world;
his
inner eyes do also -- WHEN they are aiding his outer ones in this
job,
which
they do by the manipulation of abstract symbols representing the physical
world to profitably process information thereabout which neither his visible
sight
nor
any other of his physical senses can do.
That alone is inner sight’s “serious” work.
Just
as man’s visible eyes can do their serious work,
(such
as looking out for tornadoes & telemarketers),
they
can also (when not so involved) engage in frivolousness,
and
simply entertain themselves by looking at a sunset, or a movie;
man’s
inner eyes, when not assisting his outer ones in survival pertinent matters,
entertain themselves by looking AT themselves -- no, no! –
stronger
than that: by staring
at themselves:
to
while away the time, the inner eyes become so absorbed with thoughts,
the
very things at which they are inherently programmed to look,
and
which are always of significance when they concern matters related to survival,
that
the eyes merge with that at which they are looking;
the
inner eyes become one with the thoughts they are watching;
the
eyes themselves disappear into the thoughts,
and
thus has man, by some, been called: blind, asleep & out-of-touch,
and
as per supra, not without foundation.
When
man’s inner eyes are not engaged in looking at thoughts which are
assisting
his outer ones in some matter pertinent to survival,
the
thoughts which will automatically then appear,
and
to which they are automatically drawn
are
always thoughts about themselves;
thoughts
about the inner eyes -- thoughts about thoughts,
no
matter what description is used -- they all tell the
same story,
and
one whose simple plot is totally beyond inner eyes’ ability to grasp,
in
that the story always being told is a fiction of mirrors;
a
story teller whose only existence is through the stories it tells.
But
the feature of this blindness of supreme practical significance for the
few
is
in the inner eyes’ normal ignoring of the readily observable fact that
if
they are not looking at something of physical importance, (as dictated
by instinct),
they
are looking at themselves -- totally
–
and
totally herein means that they lose any presence;
the
eyes are lost, sunk, drowned in thoughts about themselves:
they
are rendered blind, unseeing, unknowing by absorption in themselves.
This
is natural to man, and the majority feel nothing amiss,
indeed,
most enjoy it immensely:
it
is men’s favorite pastime -- thinking-about-themselves,
and
as true today as it was yesterday and in 2001 B.C. is that
nothing
can be concluded to be “wrong” with the situation
since
it is the prevailing
situation,
but
for the mental outlaws trying to get out of Dodge far enough to be able
to
look
back at the place and get a full swallow of what it actually is,
there
is a kind of wrongness present in the fact that the situation does not
normally make clear its incestuous nature;
the
inner eyes do not have an innate intelligence to recognize when they are
looking-at
-- staring-at
-- only themselves,
while
calling it something else -- anything else.
The
inner eyes of most men are not born with the ability to realize
that
most of their time is spent so absorbed in staring at themselves that
for
most of a man’s life -- they constructively have no existence
of their own.
A
man can be walking toward a parked car,
his
outer eyes look at the car -- see the car,
while
his inner eyes are staring at a thought which is delightfully picturing
him
driving
such a car, an act in fact (which as everyone knows)
can
overwhelm his outer attention to the degree that he can walk right into
the car.
Make
scrupulous note that his inner eyes were not actually watching
thoughts
of the car -- but of themselves -- the man --
"the
man" being the man’s inner eyes' pictures of himself.
This
is how off duty inner eyes fool you & themselves by positing and accepting
that they think about “things” -- things other than themselves, about
cars -- but not so --
they
think & stare only at thoughts about YOU -- as cars might relate
to you (them -- the inner eyes being your standard sense of a “self”);
the
inner eyes claim they look at thoughts concerning other people,
but
only other people who have some relationship to you/them.
As
long as your inner eyes look only at thoughts about you,
the
eyes are blind -- they can see nothing
but you,
and
will thus never be able to see that for which the few so hunger,
and
which will instantly answer all of your questions,
make
your lips hurt from grin burns,
and
your socks roll up & down like greased window shades.
Unless
you catch on to the above -- you do not think;
you
& everyone else think that you do, but if you are not thinking
about something that physically exists in the world outside of you,
you
will not normally be actually thinking,
for
you will be thinking about things that do not exist,
the
primary example being your inner eyes staring at thoughts about themselves,
which
instantly wipes them from the realm of reality;
thus by thinking about yourself -- do you erase yourself.
J