The
trap is: resistance -- not meaningful resistance to physical assault,
but
meaningless resistance to things mental.
All
religions claim there is a non productive force loose in the universe,
which
is the cause of an endless struggle they identify as between
good
and evil, and proffer stories of its origin,
which
all say came from a lesser god’s attempt to overthrow the primary deity
– but this is the sanitized version -- certain not to
enlighten.
The snare is: objection -- inane objection.
Jehovah
objects to Lucifer not because he is trying to overcome him,
but
because he does not take him seriously enough –
Lucifer
does not sufficiently resist what Jehovah has to say.
The
tug of war seemingly played out in man is not between things good
and
things evil in any meaningful sense, but rather is just a reflection of
the
juxtaposition -- in man
-- of the essentials of survival,
shoulder-to-shoulder
with poseurs.
Allah
did not kick Satan out of heaven because he was a threat,
but
because he ignored – sometimes even giggled --
at
the former’s ideas and pronouncements.
(It
is hard to say with certainty which of the two inflames him most.)
The
hormonal essentials of life dominate;
man’s
recreational neural activity wants to: there is: "the great struggle;”
not
between good and evil, but between a would-be, leader-of-the-pack,
and
the wolves who will not treat him with the gravity he thinks he deserves.
A
blow is always resisted by a sane man -- thoughts, only by
fools.
The
opposite of good is not evil, but pretension -- pompous pretension
by neurons;
would
be usurpers of power which, if it even takes notice,
the
real power finds amusing -- not threatening.
To
be unenlightened and ordinary is to be in a place wherein
this
dreamed-of coup is
treated seriously,
and
being-asleep is the sensation that comes from being trapped in
the
middle of this meaningless melee.
Mental
manifestations which the ordinary call, evil or ignorant,
and
the mystics, unenlightened or sleeping, are neither --
the
most that could be said from a fully informed view is that they are laughable.
To
be sane and civilized is to vocally resist that which your thoughts find
in error, either factually or morally:
factually
covers the sane side, morally, the civilized;
the
first may bear directly on your survival,
the
second on your acceptance in the pack;
one
is essential -- the other social & symbolic.
The
secret intelligence of those who know-what-is-going-on
is
not in some supernatural ability to distinguish error from truth,
but
in their not taking seriously in matters intangible, the notion of
error.
You
are not a fool by being a fool --
but
from objecting to foolishness and treating it seriously.
(Far,
far from routine MentalCityLife
-- and deep into Metaphorville):
God
would pay no mind if someone laughed at him -- or ignored him,
but
Satan can not stand it;
good
would resist nothing -- but evil must, everything;
hormones
have nothing to prove --
neurons
face a never ending scramble for respect.
At
a level seldom reached by would-be travelers,
the
struggle is not between: being asleep and being awake,
but
between seriousness and foolishness,
and
while it has been clearly well spelled, verbally above –
it
is quite tricky to realize for yourself --
which is which.
J
…no
reason however, not to offer one additional hint:
anything
that any thought in you says is serious -- is ridiculous
-- not worth you resisting or objecting to -- but if
you do,
then
you are ridiculous and living in a dream.