In
the life outside of you, and the one inside of you and every other man,
there
are doers & story-tellers:
kings & priests; warriors & philosophers:
peasants
& poets: tyrants & elected officials, and --
hormones
& neurons: the sources of all doing
and story-telling.
When
you fully recognize on your own that all of human existence
consists
of either: doing
or story-telling
-- and that that is all there is –
your
consciousness will be freed of a crippling weight which
the
rest of humanity is not even aware is there.
It
may at first sound to your routine mind so simple as to be useless --
but
for the few, the expedient utilization of this view can prove priceless.
A
crisp, clear look reveals it to be verbally inescapable:
everything
that man does,
from
the grandiose to the mundane;
from
the spiritual to the profane;
from
the largest and seemingly most important,
to
the tiniest and apparently least significant --
each
and every activity of man can be seen to be either: doing
or story-telling;
no
matter where you look you can find nothing to which man devotes his attention
that does not clearly fall into one of these two ad hoc categories.
This
division includes no qualitative judgment on any of the human activities,
but
simply presents a verbally accurate map of how things are.
It
matters not whether you use the terms, doing & story-telling,
or others,
but
if you do not recognize that all of human existence consists of one or
the other, what is really going on in life will remain hidden from you,
and
you will continue to aimlessly mull about,
muttering
along with all the other forced attendees
at
the never ending cocktail party at Babel Towers.
For
the use of the secret few with the SpeciallyHungryEyes,
it
is not a functional oversimplification to say that all
of your distracting idiocy has but a single cause: your failure to realize
this strict division,
and
your subsequent confusing of the two.
For
those sincerely desirous of getting-to-the-bottom-of-things
nothing
serves to distort your comprehension of what is going on in life more than
does your thoughts’ invalid commingling of: doing
& story-telling;
it
may first strike you as fishy, but if you would force your mind to continually
take
the time to place whatever it may be that catches its attention
into
one of these two categories, your basic perception of life and of other
people would be forced onto a more sound footing.
By
survival instinct, it is suitable that certain doings of other men be resisted,
(assault,
theft),
but
to be free yourself -- let other men be free to tell whatever
stories they like,
for
once you recognize -- for yourself –
down
into the gooiest marrow of your deepest neural bones --
that
everything in the life of man is either: doing
or
story-telling,
you
then get suddenly struck with the most obvious-of-obviousnesses–
that
the stories men tell from their mind --
--
no matter how erroneous & insane your
mind may find them to be –
have
no real impact on the life you actually lead.
II
you are of nothing but ordinary-mind, their stories may certainly
upset you,
but
step even slightly aside that reactionary area of your consciousness,
and
it is clear as can be that all of their outrageous ideas, beliefs, opinions,
and
theories are nothing but harmless: story-telling,
and
have can have no effect on your life unless you confuse them with doing.
No
man's stories have any pertinence to your life whatsoever
unless
you are so drowsy and distracted in consciousness as to
confuse
story-telling
for doing-something,
and
thereby allow
the story-telling
to effect you.
Life
is observably arranged for men to make no such distinction between
doing
and story-telling, and indeed, confusing the two can be seen as an
integral
ingredient in the full array of what he calls, progress,
(both
technological and cultural.;
It
is clearly not intended that the consciousness of man-the-collective
be
making constant mark of what is a doing-of-something,
and
what is simply a story-telling-about-something
(except
in immediate survival threatening situations).
A
ceaseless, unnoticed intermingling of the two is as much a part of
man’s
standard life as is his clothing,
which,
for collective, civilized conditions are a necessity,
but
for a recluse outside TheCity,
an elective.
This
possibility of choice never comes into play unless you first grasp the
layout of
the
only field available for the game,
and
it is divided clearly into one area of doing,
and
another area of nothing but story-telling.
The
feature that most bamboozles is that the story-telling can be about
doing --
and
be so dramatic and passionate that it is all too easy -- and natural
--
for
your thoughts to be totally swept up therein,
and
for doing and
story-telling
about
doing
to become indistinguishably intertwined.
This
is man's most common form of confusion;
the
other variety is more devilish and difficult to see,
it
is: story-telling about other
story-telling.
Compared
to doing -- which is always true,
(in
the sense that it is the basis of survival, and is alone, essential),
story-telling
about story-telling is like: lying-about-lying;
it
is, (for the few with an actual pre death, non physical destination in
mind),
like
being constantly offered additional mis-directions every time you
inquire about
the
original wrong ones you were given –
and
it does not simply come (unwittingly) from other men,
but
from the thoughts life normally provides to your brain.
If
you do not have your own firm recognition of the difference between
doing
& story-telling,
and are thus confused from the outset,
you
can expect to be even further fooled by the story-telling about
story-telling --
--
things can only get worse: (you catch a cold -- you can expect the
flu).
No
man would argue over any matter that he could not physically touch
did
he not first confuse doing
with story-telling,
and
once he has, (which everyone does),
there
is no turning back nor escape -- not without totally extraordinary
effort,
born
from some innate desire in only a few.
There
is no standard procedure for “talking-your-way-out-of-a-fairy-tale:”
regardless
of what Hercules may say –
no
matter what wondrous stories
he might tell about his life –
he
cannot extract himself from his imaginary existence,
and
this is the precise position of your automatic thinking
vis
a vis the world of essential reality -- the world of
doing.
Doing,
as everyone knows, can be great fun, (eating, running, fucking, fighting),
doing
is indeed the mother of all that is pleasurable,
but
in man, story-telling too
can be most engaging,
and
recognizing its distinction in no wise prohibits this potential.
Story-telling
is not wrong;
for
the life of an ordinary man, it is indispensable,
and
there is no need for him to have a consistent awareness of the
difference
between it and actual doing.
In
a routine existence, the two automatically intertwine and compliment one
another
in
such a seamless operation that men’s normal consciousness
never
takes note thereof;
a
civilized, sophisticated, cultured and normal man lives seventy odd years
engaged-in
and surrounded-by two quite separate and distinct things:
doing
and story-telling,
and
never once, in any meaningful manner, realizes it.
To be-asleep
-- in all its glory -- is to not recognize this;
to be unenlightened
is to confuse story-telling
with doing:
that is all there is to any of this --
that is all there is to everything.
J
From one plumb view: the whole, search-for-enlightenment thing is the supreme story-telling.
......Achtung,
echt über goobers.