Hearing ordinary minds explain life and predict the future
is like seeing a water molecule stick its tongue out at the ocean.

Archeology Update:
The Tower Of Babel was not actually destroyed
it's only been hiding, and none too well at that.

Legacy Update:
The simple will not "inherit" the Earth -- they never lost possession of it.
(If you can correctly translate "simple" into "basic.")

And a fan writes:
"Sometimes when you speak of the simple, it sounds to me to be in a negative way, while, in other references, it does not seem so. Where is the consistency in this, and why do you do it?"
...I keep telling you: It's tuxedos in the ballroom, overalls in the garage.

There was once a man who gave lectures on the mystical,
and sometimes he'd talk for months directly about the mystical,
then go for long periods talking about everyday affairs from a mystical
viewpoint, and finally one of his listeners asked him why he used this
dual approach rather than addressing, all of the time, the subject itself
solely, and the lecturer gave him this reply: "That is a quite fair question."

One chap was struck with the following:
"Why are all of man's pictures of supernatural beings, both good and bad, always, in part, mortal or
demons simply being men with horns and hooves, and angels but men with wings.
Why, even in such an area where you'd expect his imagination to be truly free, are his mental concepts so mortally bound?"

Obviously can no livers dream of gods non-bile in nature,
so how come penthouses to theorize their architecture
and take not into account the building's foundation?

There is a mentally unrecognized basis upon which a ship can make greater headway…
if it is unaware of the water.
A sort of overriding of drag, by way of inattention.
(Another of those physically impossible principles,
yet one magnificently operational, exclusively in the case of man.)